<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bush at the Olympics&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicalrogue.com/a-bush-at-the-olympics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalrogue.com/a-bush-at-the-olympics/</link>
	<description>Real Clear Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Race Brunton</title>
		<link>http://politicalrogue.com/a-bush-at-the-olympics/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Race Brunton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalrogue.com/?p=313#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Never call the Chinese communists. They are Maoists, and the one is not like the other, as Nikita Khrushchev would have told you. Although Maoism may have developed out of some of the core ideas of Marxism, it had morphed beyond all recognition by 1949. If you're interested in the details, compare the Marxist-Leninist view of the role of science and the revolutionary significance of the proletariat vis a vis the peasantry to Maoist thought on the same issues, among many other differences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never call the Chinese communists. They are Maoists, and the one is not like the other, as Nikita Khrushchev would have told you. Although Maoism may have developed out of some of the core ideas of Marxism, it had morphed beyond all recognition by 1949. If you&#8217;re interested in the details, compare the Marxist-Leninist view of the role of science and the revolutionary significance of the proletariat vis a vis the peasantry to Maoist thought on the same issues, among many other differences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

